![What’s new in Android’s May 2025 Google System Updates [U: 5/16]](https://i0.wp.com/9to5google.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2025/01/google-play-services-1.jpg?resize=1200%2C628&quality=82&strip=all&ssl=1)
-xl-(1)-xl-xl.jpg)
![SoundCloud latest company to hit trouble with AI clause in T&Cs [U]](https://i0.wp.com/9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2025/05/SoundCloud-latest-company-to-hit-trouble-with-AI-clause-in-TCs.jpg?resize=1200%2C628&quality=82&strip=all&ssl=1)
![Epic Games: Fortnite is offline for Apple devices worldwide after app store rejection [updated]](https://helios-i.mashable.com/imagery/articles/00T6DmFkLaAeJiMZlCJ7eUs/hero-image.fill.size_1200x675.v1747407583.jpg)
.jpg)
Montana Becomes First State To Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
Montana has enacted SB 282, becoming the first state to prohibit law enforcement from purchasing personal data they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. The landmark legislation closes what privacy advocates call the "data broker loophole," which previously allowed police to buy geolocation data, electronic communications, and other sensitive information from third-party vendors without judicial oversight. The new law specifically restricts government access to precise geolocation data, communications content, electronic funds transfers, and "sensitive data" including health status, religious affiliation, and biometric information. Police can still access this information through traditional means: warrants, investigative subpoenas, or device owner consent. Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Montana has enacted SB 282, becoming the first state to prohibit law enforcement from purchasing personal data they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. The landmark legislation closes what privacy advocates call the "data broker loophole," which previously allowed police to buy geolocation data, electronic communications, and other sensitive information from third-party vendors without judicial oversight.
The new law specifically restricts government access to precise geolocation data, communications content, electronic funds transfers, and "sensitive data" including health status, religious affiliation, and biometric information. Police can still access this information through traditional means: warrants, investigative subpoenas, or device owner consent.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
